Pro-government demos give Bolsonaro some breathing room

Raphael Tsavkko Garcia . May 27, 2019

Paulista Avenue

In 156 cities across all states, over 100,000 people took to the streets to defend Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil’s far-right president. According to a survey carried out by professors Luiza Aguiar, Pablo Ortellado, and Márcio Moretto on São Paulo’s Paulista Avenue, among the principal demands put forward by demonstrators included support for the government’s pension reform bill, mentioned by 75 percent of attendants.

However, radical agendas also found space to flourish. Six percent of respondents cited the shutdown of Congress and the Supreme Court as their reason for spending a sunny Sunday holding placards, dressed in yellow and green, and shouting in favor of the president. We also witnessed some of the same anti-feminist, <a href="https://brazilian.report/opinion/2018/10/19/joao-doria-workers-party/">anti-Workers’ Party</a> rhetoric that propelled Mr. Bolsonaro from <a href="https://brazilian.report/power/2019/02/07/revolution-lower-clergy-congress/">Congress backbencher</a> to President of Brazil. However, while those agendas helped galvanize a part of the crowd, they also kept other conservative groups away. The most prominent example being the Free Brazil Movement (MBL), dubbed “traitors” by many of Sunday’s speakers. The pro-government movement comes almost two weeks after students and teachers took to the street to protest budget cuts in the Education Ministry. While Sunday’s protests drew smaller crowds in fewer cities, they were still undeniably large in São Paulo, Brasília, and Rio de Janeiro—the three main political centers of the country. This also gave pro-Bolsonaro demonstrators a huge gain in media exposure and reach. <h2>Who won the streets?</h2> Any assessment of a movement that was neither a hit nor miss is firmly in the eye of the beholder. Depending on the political leanings of your interlocutor, you could get completely different accounts. Those on the left ridiculed the protests, calling them an utter flop, while conservatives spent the day talking about the “spontaneity” of these “massive” demonstrations. In reality, though, it doesn’t matter “who won.” What matters is how <a href="https://brazilian.report/power/2019/05/10/bolsonaro-brazil-congress-parliamentarism/">Congress</a> interprets the pro-Bolsonaro protests. The true effects of the demonstrations will be felt tomorrow, when lawmakers return to Brasília. The trigger for Sunday’s demos was the tug-of-war between the Executive and Legislative branches of government. The president’s backers specifically went after the “Big Center,” a group of center-right parties which holds a majority in the House and has a reputation for horse trading. Since taking office, Mr. Bolsonaro has refused to negotiate with them, unlike all of his predecessors. The new president insists on calling himself a representative of a “new way” of doing politics. He preferred to talk to issue-based caucuses, such as groups of representatives in favor of landowners, or evangelicals. But in doing so, Mr. Bolsonaro refused to talk to small and medium-sized parties of the Big Center—which always tip the scales in congressional votes. As a result, the government’s agenda has stalled. His decades as a backbencher haven’t taught the president much about political craft. Mr. Bolsonaro’s usual demeanor—screaming and insulting his colleagues—will do him little favors as the head of the government. <h2>The war of narratives</h2> Mr. Bolsonaro will use his propaganda machine—made up of fervent supporters and social media bots—to claim Sunday as a personal victory. On Twitter, the pro-Bolsonaro demonstration generated more engagement than those of May 15, but produced fewer posts (1.4 million v. 1.6 million). How many of these posts and subsequent engagement were the result of bots is unknown. On May 30, students and teachers are set to hold a second round of demonstrations against Mr. Bolsonaro. These marches will be key to show whether the opposition remains mobilized, or if May 15 was just a fluke. Even if “his” demonstrations were smaller, Mr. Bolsonaro did manage to show strength, and only the continuous mobilization of the opposition will be able to put this administration in real danger. An isolated demonstration does not seem enough to cause real damage to a government that has so far been its own worst enemy. As journalist Leonardo Sakamoto <a href="https://blogdosakamoto.blogosfera.uol.com.br/2019/05/27/pesquisa-em-ato-aponta-que-bolsonarismo-consolida-sua-identidade-politica/">pointed out</a>, the pro-Bolsonaro protests served to consolidate his political identity: “Little participation of young people (average age of 45), family income above BRL 5,000 and [participants with] university degrees.” If we can extrapolate the results of the survey in São Paulo to other regions, we can see that an important part of the young electorate preferred to stay at home—which can be partially explained by MBL’s absence. The supporters who took to the streets have been able to resist almost half a year of a government that can only be defined as a failure. Faced with this sad reality, they sought salvation on the streets. Whether demonstrations will actually save him or not will depend on the upcoming chapters.

Read the full story

Start your 7-day free trial

Raphael Tsavkko Garcia

Journalist and researcher at the Ph.D. program in Human Rights of University of Deusto, Spain.

YOU SHOULD ALSO READ

Perspectives of a turbulent Bolsonaro government

Social media blunder shines light on latest rift in Bolsonaro government

First mass anti-government protests raise uncertainties for Bolsonaro

Ensuring Moro a Supreme Court seat a bad move by Bolsonaro

Raphael Tsavkko Garcia