Never before has the Brazilian media – and electorate – been so bombarded with presidential polls. On Wednesday alone we had two, from Ibope and Paraná Pesquisas. And while they showed similar trends for the first round – that is, Jair Bolsonaro firmly in the lead and Fernando Haddad comfortable in second place – their results were significantly different.
We at The Brazilian Report have made an editorial decision to only consider data from Ibope and Datafolha for our analysis, as these institutes have withstood the test of time and are historically the most accurate in the country. In this article, however, we will address these other institutes and discuss what causes results to be different.
In previous articles, Diogo Rodriguez talked about differences in methods between pollsters which can push the results one way or the other, and Euan Marshall explained how investment banks are using presidential polls they commission themselves to create events in the market and enlarge their profits. Now, we are going to dig deeper into the methods used by pollsters – which may help you decide which ones you want to use as a reference.
Unlike what candidates such as far-right Jair Bolsonaro...
The specialization trend among corporate board members It is not only a matter of perception:…
Panama will hold its presidential elections on Sunday, months after huge protests saw thousands descend…
The city of Rio de Janeiro estimates that a Madonna concert this Saturday on Copacabana…
Latin America’s trend of banning opposition candidates from elections has caught on in an ever-growing…
The São Paulo City Council on Thursday approved legislation authorizing Brazil’s largest city to sign…
The preliminary report on AI regulations presented to Brazil’s Senate last week provides a middle-of-the-road…