Why is Brazil’s lower house impervious to public opinion?

Pro-environment groups occupied Brazil’s Congress last week to protest against the approval of a set of bills known as the “destruction package,” including proposals to loosen rules on pesticide use and mining, among other changes. On Wednesday, protesters were joined by famous Brazilian songwriter Caetano Veloso for a rally against a bill legalizing mining activities on protected indigenous lands. However, despite this high-profile pressure, the House went ahead and fast-tracked the bill regardless, meaning it will go to a vote between April 12 and 14, without having to undergo analysis from a series of legislative committees.

In light of this decision, one must ask why Brazil’s lower house has been so impervious to public opinion. Are its members of Congress simply not fussed about voters’ opinions? Even in an election year? 

While the “secret budget” has acted as a cushion protecting lawmakers against unpopular decisions, analysts have overlooked another explanation for this phenomenon. The agribusiness caucus has been a key driving force behind the so-called “destruction package,” which, under House Speaker Arthur Lira, has only become more powerful and influential. 

Pro-environment groups seek to stop the approval of the following bills: PL 3729/2004, which weakens restrictions on economic activities that can be carried out on protected...