Government bills stall in year of congressional activism

. Dec 18, 2020
bills congress brazil Brazilian Congress building. Photo: Roque Sá/Agência Senado

2020 has been an important year for congressional activism in Brazil. Working remotely since March, lawmakers have prioritized legislation related to the Covid-19 pandemic, with roughly 46 percent of the 133 bills enacted by Congress being linked to the coronavirus crisis.

Among these proposals was the coronavirus emergency aid program, which was the result of a legal framework originating from a bill submitted by Congressman Eduardo Barbosa. Meanwhile, legislators secured the approval of other key proposals, such as the National Basic Education Fund (Fundeb), which was made a permanent policy in July.

</p> <p>However, 2020 has seen Congress largely fail to pass the government&#8217;s economic agenda, including reforms to the tax system and public service.</p> <p>The lawmaking process for the approval of the coronavirus emergency benefit program is indicative of a long-term pattern of congressional activism that dates back to the <a href="">early 2000s</a>. The federal government initially proposed a monthly benefit of just BRL 200 (USD 39), but <a href="">the lower house made its own proposal</a> to raise payments to BRL 500. Under pressure and not wanting to be outdone by Congress, the government increased the benefit further, settling on <a href="">BRL 600 to be paid each month</a>. Subsequently, Senator Randolfe Rodrigues sponsored <a href="">changes</a> that expanded the pool of recipients to include senior citizens, people with disabilities, and individuals with chronic illnesses.&nbsp;</p> <p>Elsewhere, a group of lower house representatives were responsible for a law that allowed the <a href=";fichaAmigavel=nao">immediate release</a> of medical equipment and medication. Congress also actively approved Executive-sponsored bills addressing the Covid-19 crisis, such as provisional decrees authorizing pandemic-related spending and a bill that specified <a href="">social distancing and quarantining guidelines</a>.&nbsp;</p> <h2>Education, racism, and sanitation</h2> <p>Congressional activism has been observed in other policy areas besides the coronavirus pandemic, with legislators either leading lawmaking processes or aiding the Executive branch in discussing and improving its proposals.</p> <p>A prime example of this concerned the National Basic Education Fund (Fundeb). Set to expire at the end of this year, Congress approved a constitutional amendment with the help of civil society organizations that made Fundeb a permanent fixture. </p> <p>The change benefits millions of students enrolled in the public education system, as it guarantees funding for teachers and school administrations. The new amendment also increases the amount of money invested by the federal government in public education. Recently, the House and Senate approved a <a href="">bill</a> to regulate the implementation of Fundeb.</p> <p>Civil rights have also been on the forefront, with the lower house approving a bill this week to ratify the <a href="">Inter-American Convention Against Racism</a>. Human rights treaties and international conventions approved by Congress have the same force as constitutional amendments, meaning that if the Senate follows suit and approves the treaty, Brazil would have a constitutional mandate to prevent, eliminate, prohibit, and punish all racists acts.&nbsp;</p> <p>Earlier in the year, in discussions around Brazil&#8217;s <a href="">new sanitation law</a>, legislators served as co-policymakers to the federal government. The approved framework has the goal of universalizing access to water and sanitation systems by 2033. In conjunction with the federal government, members of Congress worked to improve the bill ever since its submission by way of a provisional decree sponsored by the government of ex-President Michel Temer.&nbsp;</p> <h2>No push for government-backed bills</h2> <p>Despite this activism in several policy areas, Congress has done little to approve important structural policies sponsored by the Jair Bolsonaro administration. Party squabbles last month locked the legislative agenda in the House and prevented representatives from voting on any substantive proposals.</p> <p>However, much of the blame for this lack of activity lies at the doorstep of <a href="">the Bolsonaro administration itself</a>. Throughout 2020, Economy Minister Paulo Guedes has continuously delayed sending the government’s proposals for tax and public service reforms. Recently, House Speaker Rodrigo Maia issued a challenge to Mr. Guedes, saying &#8220;there are no more excuses&#8221; for the government to delay furthering structural reforms.&nbsp;</p> <p>Indeed, Mr. Maia himself will be at the center of Congress&#8217; main focus at the beginning of 2021. In February, both the House and Senate will hold leadership elections, and while Rodrigo Maia will not be allowed to run for another term as Speaker, he will be hoping to elect a handpicked successor.</p> <p>Regardless of who gets the job, the House is poised to continue its part in the broader trend of congressional activism. However, furthering the government&#8217;s economic agenda will require significant goodwill between the legislature and executive branches.

Read the full story NOW!

Beatriz Rey

Beatriz Rey is a research fellow at the Center for Latin American & Latino Studies (CLALS) at American University and a Ph.D. Candidate in Political Science at the Maxwell School at Syracuse University.

Our content is protected by copyright. Want to republish The Brazilian Report? Email us at